Public engineering report

Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0147
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$32.00 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0147
MaterialThorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue
ManufacturerThorwell
Product lineStandard
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishSilk
Reinforcement
ColorBlue

Governed engineering profile

Overall31/100
Tensile12/100
Impact14/100
Stiffness43/100
Consistency66/100
Layer adhesion21/100
Thermal26/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
31/100
Tensile
12/100
Impact
14/100
Stiffness
43/100
Consistency
66/100
Layer adhesion
21/100
Thermal
26/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Thorwell

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

51 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall31/10050/10045/100
Tensile12/10029/10025/100
Impact14/10024/10026/100
Stiffness43/10087/10075/100
Consistency66/10079/10076/100
Layer adhesion21/10030/10021/100
Thermal26/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright3.23 MPa1.088 MPa33.7%66/10
Tensile flat15.319 MPa3.633 MPa23.7%1010/10
Impact upright68.743 kJ/m²37.198 kJ/m²54.1%1010/10
Impact flat212.835 kJ/m²42.48 kJ/m²20%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1299.382 MPa
Stiffness deflection4.176 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue has a low engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 19 points and below its manufacturer average by 13,4 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Thorwell Standard Silk PLA Silk Blue is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 1% overall, is below the material-family average by 19 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 13,4 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 1%
233 / 234

Strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 66/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 12/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 14/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 43/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Consistency: 66/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall31/100233 / 234Better than 1%
Tensile12/100223 / 226Better than 2%
Impact14/100190 / 226Better than 16%
Stiffness43/100211 / 223Better than 6%
Consistency66/100221 / 231Better than 5%
Layer adhesion21/100134 / 226Better than 41%
Thermal26/100176 / 209Better than 16%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.