Public printing recommendation

Yasin Standard Clear PMMA Clear

MaterialID MAT0035

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
2026-08-25 19:05:46

Guidance boundary: values below are shared base-material guidance resolved only through the canonical BaseMaterialId link. They are not manufacturer-, spool- or printer-specific validated settings. Missing fields remain Not recorded.
Overall
39/100
Engineering axes
6/5
Public rank
211 / 234
MSRP USD/kg
36.80

Engineering profile

Overall
39/100
Tensile
20/100
Impact
31/100
Stiffness
30/100
Consistency
67/100
Layer adhesion
46/100

Recommended applications

  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Measured strengths

  • Best available signal: Consistency at 67/100.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 31/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 30/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Base-material printing guidance

GuidanceMinimumRecommendedMaximumUnit
Nozzle temperature250250260°C
Bed temperature909090°C
Print speed105555mm/s
Cooling0010%
GuidanceValueUnit
Cooling guidanceOff
Drying temperature80°C
Drying time12hours
EnclosureNot required
Printer / G-code referencePrusaCoreOneL
Slicer profile referenceYasin PMMA

Print workflow checks

Decision guidance

Stronger same-family alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
Confirm exact settings against the manufacturer profile, spool label and actual printer/material combination. Results do not replace application-specific validation.

Testing methodology · Download PDF