Public engineering report

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0240
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$26.88 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0240
MaterialYasin Standard White HIPS White
ManufacturerYasin
Product lineStandard
Base materialHIPS
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorWhite

Governed engineering profile

Overall42/100
Tensile12/100
Impact—
Izod48/100
Charpy49/100
Stiffness66/100
Consistency72/100
Layer adhesion11/100
Thermal40/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
42/100
Tensile
12/100
Impact
—
Izod
48/100
Charpy
49/100
Stiffness
66/100
Consistency
72/100
Layer adhesion
11/100
Thermal
40/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - HIPS
Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 35.446 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

80 °C · score 40/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall42/100——
Tensile12/10013/10025/100
Impact———
Izod48/10048/10016/100
Charpy49/10049/10015/100
Stiffness66/10064/10075/100
Consistency72/10070/10072/100
Layer adhesion11/10011/10019/100
Thermal40/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright1.88 MPa1.079 MPa57.4%99/10
Tensile flat16.965 MPa4.413 MPa26%1010/10
Impact upright5.305 kJ/m²1.116 kJ/m²21%1010/10
Impact flat35.085 kJ/m²5.486 kJ/m²15.6%1010/10
Izod38.196 kJ/m²3.111 kJ/m²8.1%1010/10
Charpy39.401 kJ/m²5.476 kJ/m²13.9%77/10
Stiffness modulus1984.002 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.735 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-08-19
Impact2026-08-20
Izod2026-10-06
Charpy2026-10-06
Stiffness2026-08-18
Thermal2026-08-20

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard White HIPS White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard White HIPS White is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 37% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 37%
105 / 166

Strengths

  • Consistency: 72/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 12/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 11/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall42/100105 / 166Better than 37%
Tensile12/100239 / 243Better than 2%
Impact———
Izod48/1007 / 171Better than 96%
Charpy49/1007 / 170Better than 96%
Stiffness66/100175 / 240Better than 28%
Consistency72/100188 / 244Better than 23%
Layer adhesion11/100207 / 243Better than 15%
Thermal40/10055 / 226Better than 76%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0146Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS BlueThorwell—14/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 38.196 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 3.111 kJ/m²; CV 8.145%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 39.401 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 5.476 kJ/m²; CV 13.898%; Samples 7; Confidence 7
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.