Public engineering report

Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0238

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$33.44 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0238
Material	Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green
Manufacturer	Yasin
Product line	Standard
Base material	PCTG
Category	Standard
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	—
Color	Green

Governed engineering profile

Overall	35/100
Tensile	22/100
Impact	—
Izod	3/100
Charpy	2/100
Stiffness	53/100
Consistency	67/100
Layer adhesion	30/100
Thermal	39/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

35/100

Tensile

22/100

Impact

—

Izod

3/100

Charpy

2/100

Stiffness

53/100

Consistency

67/100

Layer adhesion

30/100

Thermal

39/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - PCTG

Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 10.309 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

78 °C · score 39/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	35/100	39/100	—
Tensile	22/100	28/100	25/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	3/100	6/100	16/100
Charpy	2/100	5/100	15/100
Stiffness	53/100	60/100	75/100
Consistency	67/100	74/100	72/100
Layer adhesion	30/100	24/100	19/100
Thermal	39/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	8.044 MPa	3.704 MPa	46%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	26.793 MPa	12.068 MPa	45%	10	10/10
Impact upright	2.656 kJ/m²	0.768 kJ/m²	28.9%	10	10/10
Impact flat	9.091 kJ/m²	1.263 kJ/m²	13.9%	10	10/10
Izod	2.253 kJ/m²	0.675 kJ/m²	30%	10	10/10
Charpy	1.286 kJ/m²	0.143 kJ/m²	11.1%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	1583.796 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	3.426 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	2026-08-20
Impact	2026-08-20
Izod	2026-10-05
Charpy	2026-10-05
Stiffness	2026-08-20
Thermal	2026-08-20

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green has a low engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 3,8 points and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Charpy.

Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Green PCTG Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 7% overall, is below the material-family average by 3,8 points, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Charpy is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Charpy

Dataset position

Better than 7%

155 / 166

Strengths

Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.

Limitations

Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 2/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Layer adhesion: 30/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	35/100	155 / 166	Better than 7%
Tensile	22/100	183 / 243	Better than 25%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	3/100	162 / 171	Better than 6%
Charpy	2/100	167 / 170	Better than 2%
Stiffness	53/100	213 / 240	Better than 12%
Consistency	67/100	210 / 244	Better than 14%
Layer adhesion	30/100	90 / 243	Better than 63%
Thermal	39/100	58 / 226	Better than 75%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact
MAT0039	3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black	3D Fuel	45/100	27/100	—
MAT0041	3D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue	3D Fuel	44/100	34/100	—
MAT0040	3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red	3D Fuel	39/100	25/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0039	3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black	3D Fuel	45/100	27/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0041	3D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue	3D Fuel	44/100	34/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0040	3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red	3D Fuel	39/100	25/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0267	Coex 3D Prime Banany Yellow PCTG Yellow	Coex 3D	35/100	27/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0227	Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG Blue	Spectrum	33/100	34/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-05
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 2.253 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.675 kJ/m²; CV 29.971%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-05
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 1.286 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.143 kJ/m²; CV 11.117%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.