Public engineering report

Spectrum Greeney Pro Real Green PLA Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0226
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$75.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0226
MaterialSpectrum Greeney Pro Real Green PLA Green
ManufacturerSpectrum
Product lineGreeney Pro
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall44/100
Tensile18/100
Impact—
Izod27/100
Charpy36/100
Stiffness96/100
Consistency63/100
Layer adhesion10/100
Thermal28/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
44/100
Tensile
18/100
Impact
—
Izod
27/100
Charpy
36/100
Stiffness
96/100
Consistency
63/100
Layer adhesion
10/100
Thermal
28/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Spectrum

Legacy Impact radar: 26.128 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

56 °C · score 28/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall44/100——
Tensile18/10030/10026/100
Impact———
Izod27/10010/1008/100
Charpy36/10011/1009/100
Stiffness96/10087/10069/100
Consistency63/10077/10069/100
Layer adhesion10/10031/10024/100
Thermal28/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright2.538 MPa1.194 MPa47.1%66/10
Tensile flat26.455 MPa7.647 MPa28.9%99/10
Impact upright5.181 kJ/m²0.663 kJ/m²12.8%1010/10
Impact flat24.591 kJ/m²2.31 kJ/m²9.4%1010/10
Izod21.916 kJ/m²9.779 kJ/m²44.6%1010/10
Charpy29.056 kJ/m²5.949 kJ/m²20.5%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2883.003 MPa————
Stiffness deflection1.882 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-08-13
Impact2026-08-13
Izod2026-10-08
Charpy2026-10-08
Stiffness2026-08-11
Thermal2026-05-14

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Spectrum Greeney Pro Real Green PLA Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Spectrum Greeney Pro Real Green PLA Green is best understood as a limited-use material that should be validated carefully before functional use. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 49% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 49%
86 / 166

Strengths

  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 32/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 96/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 18/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 32/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Consistency: 63/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.
  • Layer adhesion: 10/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall44/10086 / 166Better than 49%
Tensile18/100212 / 243Better than 13%
Impact———
Izod27/10015 / 171Better than 92%
Charpy36/10012 / 170Better than 94%
Stiffness96/10056 / 240Better than 77%
Consistency63/100223 / 244Better than 9%
Layer adhesion10/100225 / 243Better than 8%
Thermal28/100117 / 226Better than 49%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0106Add:North Econymy PLA BlackAdd:North55/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0161Winkle Standard Confeti PLA HD Texture BrownWinkle52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-08
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 29.056 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 5.949 kJ/m²; CV 20.475%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-08
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 21.916 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 9.779 kJ/m²; CV 44.621%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.