Public engineering report

Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0219
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$16.50 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0219
MaterialEryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow
ManufacturerEryone
Product lineStandard
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishSilk
Reinforcement
ColorYellow

Governed engineering profile

Overall37/100
Tensile20/100
Impact15/100
Stiffness68/100
Consistency72/100
Layer adhesion9/100
Thermal26/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
37/100
Tensile
20/100
Impact
15/100
Stiffness
68/100
Consistency
72/100
Layer adhesion
9/100
Thermal
26/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Eryone

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

51 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall37/10050/10046/100
Tensile20/10029/10025/100
Impact15/10024/10037/100
Stiffness68/10087/10072/100
Consistency72/10079/10074/100
Layer adhesion9/10030/10020/100
Thermal26/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright2.666 MPa1.154 MPa43.3%66/10
Tensile flat29.5 MPa10.289 MPa34.9%1010/10
Impact upright82.142 kJ/m²14.279 kJ/m²17.4%1010/10
Impact flat211.935 kJ/m²19.197 kJ/m²9.1%99/10
Stiffness modulus2027.607 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.676 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
Tensile2026-07-31
Impact2026-08-01
Stiffness2026-07-31
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 13,4 points and below its manufacturer average by 9,6 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 6% overall, is below the material-family average by 13,4 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 9,6 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 6%
220 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 72/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 15/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 9/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall37/100220 / 234Better than 6%
Tensile20/100184 / 226Better than 19%
Impact15/100182 / 226Better than 20%
Stiffness68/100157 / 223Better than 30%
Consistency72/100186 / 231Better than 20%
Layer adhesion9/100215 / 226Better than 5%
Thermal26/100176 / 209Better than 16%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.