Public engineering report

Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0219

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$16.50 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0219
Material	Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow
Manufacturer	Eryone
Product line	Standard
Base material	PLA
Category	Standard
Variant / finish	Silk
Reinforcement	—
Color	Yellow

Governed engineering profile

Overall	34/100
Tensile	20/100
Impact	—
Izod	4/100
Charpy	8/100
Stiffness	68/100
Consistency	67/100
Layer adhesion	9/100
Thermal	26/100
Best available axis	stiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall

34/100

Tensile

20/100

Impact

—

Izod

4/100

Charpy

8/100

Stiffness

68/100

Consistency

67/100

Layer adhesion

9/100

Thermal

26/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - PLA

Manufacturer average - Eryone

Legacy Impact radar: 12.429 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

51 °C · score 26/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	34/100	—	—
Tensile	20/100	30/100	24/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	4/100	10/100	13/100
Charpy	8/100	11/100	15/100
Stiffness	68/100	87/100	73/100
Consistency	67/100	77/100	71/100
Layer adhesion	9/100	31/100	21/100
Thermal	26/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	2.666 MPa	1.154 MPa	43.3%	6	6/10
Tensile flat	29.5 MPa	10.289 MPa	34.9%	10	10/10
Impact upright	3.956 kJ/m²	0.688 kJ/m²	17.4%	10	10/10
Impact flat	10.207 kJ/m²	0.925 kJ/m²	9.1%	9	9/10
Izod	3.515 kJ/m²	0.524 kJ/m²	14.9%	10	10/10
Charpy	6.24 kJ/m²	2.133 kJ/m²	34.2%	10	10/10
Stiffness modulus	2027.607 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	2.676 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	2026-07-31
Impact	2026-08-01
Izod	2026-10-11
Charpy	2026-10-11
Stiffness	2026-07-31
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow has a low engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Izod.

Data-driven review: Eryone Standard Radiant Gold PLA Silk Yellow is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 5% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Stiffness

Main limitation

Izod

Dataset position

Better than 5%

158 / 166

Strengths

Best available signal: Stiffness at 68/100.

Limitations

Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 6/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
Consistency: 67/100. Repeatability may not be the best reason to choose this filament.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications
Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	34/100	158 / 166	Better than 5%
Tensile	20/100	199 / 243	Better than 19%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	4/100	143 / 171	Better than 17%
Charpy	8/100	74 / 170	Better than 57%
Stiffness	68/100	168 / 240	Better than 30%
Consistency	67/100	211 / 244	Better than 14%
Layer adhesion	9/100	229 / 243	Better than 6%
Thermal	26/100	190 / 226	Better than 16%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Validate impact-focused or shock-loaded designs against the measured Izod/Charpy results.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact
MAT0265	Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA Red	Coex 3D	58/100	39/100	—
MAT0066	ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal Green	ProtoPasta	56/100	29/100	—
MAT0118	Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA Blue	Prusa3D	55/100	36/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0265	Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA Red	Coex 3D	58/100	39/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0066	ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal Green	ProtoPasta	56/100	29/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0118	Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA Blue	Prusa3D	55/100	36/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0106	Add:North Econymy PLA Black	Add:North	55/100	39/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0112	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA Black	Prusa3D	52/100	38/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0161	Winkle Standard Confeti PLA HD Texture Brown	Winkle	52/100	34/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0143	Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled Brown	Prusa3D	52/100	30/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0203	Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA Orange	Prusa3D	52/100	42/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-11
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 6.24 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 2.133 kJ/m²; CV 34.182%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-11
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 3.515 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.524 kJ/m²; CV 14.917%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.