Public engineering report
Eryone Standard White PP White
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Partial
Engineering axes
5/6
Public MSRP
$30.43 USD/kg
Material identity
| MaterialID | MAT0194 |
|---|---|
| Material | Eryone Standard White PP White |
| Manufacturer | Eryone |
| Product line | Standard |
| Base material | PP |
| Category | Engineering |
| Variant / finish | — |
| Reinforcement | — |
| Color | White |
Governed engineering profile
| Overall | 49/100 |
|---|---|
| Tensile | 15/100 |
| Impact | 41/100 |
| Stiffness | — |
| Consistency | 86/100 |
| Layer adhesion | 55/100 |
| Thermal | 32/100 |
| Best available axis | consistency |
Engineering score profile
Engineering radar
Selected material
Material average - PP
Manufacturer average - Eryone
All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.
Fixture thermal result
63 °C · score 32/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
| Metric | Selected material | Material average | Manufacturer average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 49/100 | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Tensile | 15/100 | 24/100 | 25/100 |
| Impact | 41/100 | 34/100 | 37/100 |
| Stiffness | — | 59/100 | 72/100 |
| Consistency | 86/100 | 85/100 | 74/100 |
| Layer adhesion | 55/100 | 33/100 | 20/100 |
| Thermal | 32/100 | — | — |
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
| Measurement | Average | Std. deviation | CV | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile upright | 8.321 MPa | 2.173 MPa | 26.1% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Tensile flat | 15.165 MPa | 0.976 MPa | 6.4% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Impact upright | 223.108 kJ/m² | 25.943 kJ/m² | 11.6% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Impact flat | 600.643 kJ/m² | 68.51 kJ/m² | 11.4% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Stiffness modulus | — | — | — | — | — |
| Stiffness deflection | — | — | — | — | — |
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
| Thermal | Not recorded |
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Eryone Standard White PP White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 2,8 points and above its manufacturer average by 2,9 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Eryone Standard White PP White is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 61% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is roughly aligned with the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 61%
92 / 234
Strengths
- Layer adhesion: 55/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
- Consistency: 86/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
- Impact: 41/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
Limitations
- Tensile: 15/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Engineering trade-offs
- Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
- Layer bonding may be acceptable, but stiffness is still a limiting design factor.
- The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.
Recommended applications
- Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
- Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
- Avoid high tensile load applications
Metric rankings and percentiles
| Metric | Score | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 49/100 | 92 / 234 | Better than 61% |
| Tensile | 15/100 | 216 / 226 | Better than 5% |
| Impact | 41/100 | 47 / 226 | Better than 80% |
| Stiffness | — | — | — |
| Consistency | 86/100 | 14 / 231 | Better than 94% |
| Layer adhesion | 55/100 | 13 / 226 | Better than 95% |
| Thermal | 32/100 | 83 / 209 | Better than 61% |
Decision guidance
- Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
- Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
Better alternatives
| MaterialID | Material | Manufacturer | Overall | Tensile | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset. | |||||
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
| MaterialID | Material | Manufacturer | Overall | Tensile | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAT0037 | Prusa3D Prusament Natural PP GF White | Prusa3D | 48/100 | 36/100 | 33/100 |
| MAT0036 | Prusa3D Prusament PP CF Black | Prusa3D | 42/100 | 22/100 | 29/100 |
Public links
Methodology and limitations
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.