Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Purple PLA Purple

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0137
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
5/6
Public MSRP
$30.40 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0137
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament Galaxy Purple PLA Purple
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish
Reinforcement
ColorPurple

Governed engineering profile

Overall55/100
Tensile32/100
Impact14/100
Stiffness96/100
Consistency84/100
Layer adhesion50/100
Thermal
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
55/100
Tensile
32/100
Impact
14/100
Stiffness
96/100
Consistency
84/100
Layer adhesion
50/100
Thermal

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

· score — · method —

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall55/10050/10049/100
Tensile32/10029/10031/100
Impact14/10024/10021/100
Stiffness96/10087/10084/100
Consistency84/10079/10079/100
Layer adhesion50/10030/10032/100
Thermal

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright16.857 MPa4.132 MPa24.5%1010/10
Tensile flat33.73 MPa4.352 MPa12.9%1010/10
Impact upright93.995 kJ/m²12.522 kJ/m²13.3%1010/10
Impact flat183.614 kJ/m²23.249 kJ/m²12.7%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2883.003 MPa
Stiffness deflection1.882 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Purple PLA Purple has a balanced mid-range engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 5 points and above its manufacturer average by 5,8 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Impact.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Purple PLA Purple is best understood as a balanced material for general functional prototypes. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 87% overall, is above the material-family average by 5 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 5,8 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Impact is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Impact
Dataset position
Better than 87%
32 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 50/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 84/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 96/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 32/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 14/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall55/10032 / 234Better than 87%
Tensile32/10084 / 226Better than 63%
Impact14/100193 / 226Better than 15%
Stiffness96/10049 / 223Better than 78%
Consistency84/10030 / 231Better than 87%
Layer adhesion50/10017 / 226Better than 93%
Thermal

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.