Public engineering report

Extrudr BioFusion Blue Fire PLA Blue

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0115
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$19.80 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0115
MaterialExtrudr BioFusion Blue Fire PLA Blue
ManufacturerExtrudr
Product lineBioFusion
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorBlue

Governed engineering profile

Overall46/100
Tensile21/100
Impact—
Izod34/100
Charpy53/100
Stiffness84/100
Consistency76/100
Layer adhesion4/100
Thermal28/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
46/100
Tensile
21/100
Impact
—
Izod
34/100
Charpy
53/100
Stiffness
84/100
Consistency
76/100
Layer adhesion
4/100
Thermal
28/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Extrudr

Legacy Impact radar: 21.549 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

55 °C · score 28/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall46/100——
Tensile21/10030/10025/100
Impact———
Izod34/10010/10023/100
Charpy53/10011/10023/100
Stiffness84/10087/10070/100
Consistency76/10077/10078/100
Layer adhesion4/10031/10025/100
Thermal28/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright1.252 MPa0.287 MPa22.9%77/10
Tensile flat33.115 MPa9.785 MPa29.5%1010/10
Impact upright7.481 kJ/m²0.65 kJ/m²8.7%1010/10
Impact flat17.073 kJ/m²4.03 kJ/m²23.6%99/10
Izod27.444 kJ/m²6.994 kJ/m²25.5%1010/10
Charpy42.195 kJ/m²6.38 kJ/m²15.1%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2527.565 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.147 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-05
Charpy2026-10-05
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Extrudr BioFusion Blue Fire PLA Blue has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: Extrudr BioFusion Blue Fire PLA Blue is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 61% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 61%
66 / 166

Strengths

  • Consistency: 76/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 44/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 84/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 21/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 4/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall46/10066 / 166Better than 61%
Tensile21/100186 / 243Better than 24%
Impact———
Izod34/1009 / 171Better than 95%
Charpy53/1006 / 170Better than 97%
Stiffness84/100109 / 240Better than 55%
Consistency76/100154 / 244Better than 37%
Layer adhesion4/100242 / 243Better than 1%
Thermal28/100123 / 226Better than 46%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0106Add:North Econymy PLA BlackAdd:North55/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0161Winkle Standard Confeti PLA HD Texture BrownWinkle52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-05
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 42.195 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 6.38 kJ/m²; CV 15.119%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-05
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 27.444 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 6.994 kJ/m²; CV 25.486%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.