Public engineering report

Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Pink

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0090
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$21.60 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0090
MaterialPrusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Pink
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product lineBuddy3D
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishSilk
Reinforcement
ColorPink

Governed engineering profile

Overall46/100
Tensile26/100
Impact14/100
Stiffness92/100
Consistency74/100
Layer adhesion21/100
Thermal27/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
46/100
Tensile
26/100
Impact
14/100
Stiffness
92/100
Consistency
74/100
Layer adhesion
21/100
Thermal
27/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

53 °C · score 27/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall46/10050/10049/100
Tensile26/10029/10031/100
Impact14/10024/10021/100
Stiffness92/10087/10084/100
Consistency74/10079/10079/100
Layer adhesion21/10030/10032/100
Thermal27/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright7.367 MPa1.771 MPa24%1010/10
Tensile flat34.853 MPa12.575 MPa36.1%1010/10
Impact upright86.423 kJ/m²27.646 kJ/m²32%1010/10
Impact flat193.905 kJ/m²19.585 kJ/m²10.1%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2753.914 MPa
Stiffness deflection1.97 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Pink has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 4,5 points and below its manufacturer average by 3,8 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Impact.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Buddy3D PLA Silk Pink is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 43% overall, is below the material-family average by 4,5 points, and is below the manufacturer average by 3,8 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Impact is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Impact
Dataset position
Better than 43%
135 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 74/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 92/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 26/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 14/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Layer adhesion: 21/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall46/100135 / 234Better than 43%
Tensile26/100132 / 226Better than 42%
Impact14/100192 / 226Better than 15%
Stiffness92/10065 / 223Better than 71%
Consistency74/100165 / 231Better than 29%
Layer adhesion21/100133 / 226Better than 42%
Thermal27/100131 / 209Better than 38%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.