Public engineering report

BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0076
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$47.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0076
MaterialBambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ Black
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineTough+
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishTough+
Reinforcement
ColorBlack

Governed engineering profile

Overall63/100
Tensile26/100
Impact59/100
Stiffness65/100
Consistency90/100
Layer adhesion73/100
Thermal25/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
63/100
Tensile
26/100
Impact
59/100
Stiffness
65/100
Consistency
90/100
Layer adhesion
73/100
Thermal
25/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

50 °C · score 25/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall63/10050/10047/100
Tensile26/10029/10026/100
Impact59/10024/10031/100
Stiffness65/10087/10077/100
Consistency90/10079/10077/100
Layer adhesion73/10030/10024/100
Thermal25/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright17.396 MPa3.052 MPa17.5%1010/10
Tensile flat23.933 MPa1.434 MPa6%1010/10
Impact upright201.636 kJ/m²25.203 kJ/m²12.5%1010/10
Impact flat975.075 kJ/m²42.651 kJ/m²4.4%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1962.896 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.765 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ Black has a balanced mid-range engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 12,4 points and above its manufacturer average by 15,5 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ Black is best understood as a balanced material for general functional prototypes. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 98% overall, is above the material-family average by 12,4 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 15,5 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 98%
6 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 73/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 90/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 59/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 26/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Stiffness: 65/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Parts where Z-axis bonding is important
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall63/1006 / 234Better than 98%
Tensile26/100142 / 226Better than 38%
Impact59/1007 / 226Better than 97%
Stiffness65/100168 / 223Better than 25%
Consistency90/1004 / 231Better than 99%
Layer adhesion73/1002 / 226Better than 100%
Thermal25/100190 / 209Better than 10%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100
MAT0096Prima Creator PrimaValue Light Gray PLA Plus GrayPrima Creator58/10033/10058/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.