Public engineering report

BambuLab Matte Ivory White PLA Matte White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0075
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$43.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0075
MaterialBambuLab Matte Ivory White PLA Matte White
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineMatte
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishMatte
Reinforcement—
ColorWhite

Governed engineering profile

Overall41/100
Tensile20/100
Impact—
Izod8/100
Charpy11/100
Stiffness59/100
Consistency82/100
Layer adhesion34/100
Thermal25/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
41/100
Tensile
20/100
Impact
—
Izod
8/100
Charpy
11/100
Stiffness
59/100
Consistency
82/100
Layer adhesion
34/100
Thermal
25/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

Legacy Impact radar: 24.975 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

49 °C · score 25/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall41/100——
Tensile20/10030/10026/100
Impact———
Izod8/10010/1008/100
Charpy11/10011/10010/100
Stiffness59/10087/10077/100
Consistency82/10077/10077/100
Layer adhesion34/10031/10024/100
Thermal25/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright8.183 MPa1.585 MPa19.4%1010/10
Tensile flat24.133 MPa5.708 MPa23.7%1010/10
Impact upright6.659 kJ/m²1.272 kJ/m²19.1%1010/10
Impact flat21.798 kJ/m²1.271 kJ/m²5.8%1010/10
Izod6.336 kJ/m²0.317 kJ/m²5%1010/10
Charpy8.829 kJ/m²1.994 kJ/m²22.6%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1757.259 MPa————
Stiffness deflection3.088 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-13
Charpy2026-10-13
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Matte Ivory White PLA Matte White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Izod.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Matte Ivory White PLA Matte White is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 33% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Izod
Dataset position
Better than 33%
112 / 166

Strengths

  • Consistency: 82/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 9/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Stiffness: 59/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 34/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall41/100112 / 166Better than 33%
Tensile20/100196 / 243Better than 20%
Impact———
Izod8/10068 / 171Better than 61%
Charpy11/10055 / 170Better than 68%
Stiffness59/100203 / 240Better than 16%
Consistency82/10070 / 244Better than 72%
Layer adhesion34/10072 / 243Better than 71%
Thermal25/100211 / 226Better than 7%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0106Add:North Econymy PLA BlackAdd:North55/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0161Winkle Standard Confeti PLA HD Texture BrownWinkle52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-13
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 6.336 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.317 kJ/m²; CV 5.008%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-13
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 8.829 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 1.994 kJ/m²; CV 22.58%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.