Public engineering report

BambuLab Matte Lillac Purple PLA Matte Purple

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0073
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$43.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0073
MaterialBambuLab Matte Lillac Purple PLA Matte Purple
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineMatte
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishMatte
Reinforcement
ColorPurple

Governed engineering profile

Overall46/100
Tensile22/100
Impact28/100
Stiffness68/100
Consistency86/100
Layer adhesion25/100
Thermal25/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
46/100
Tensile
22/100
Impact
28/100
Stiffness
68/100
Consistency
86/100
Layer adhesion
25/100
Thermal
25/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

49 °C · score 25/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall46/10050/10047/100
Tensile22/10029/10026/100
Impact28/10024/10031/100
Stiffness68/10087/10077/100
Consistency86/10079/10077/100
Layer adhesion25/10030/10024/100
Thermal25/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright7.044 MPa2.326 MPa33%1010/10
Tensile flat28.178 MPa1.777 MPa6.3%1010/10
Impact upright154.491 kJ/m²18.92 kJ/m²12.2%1010/10
Impact flat408.806 kJ/m²25.247 kJ/m²6.2%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2027.607 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.676 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Matte Lillac Purple PLA Matte Purple has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 4,4 points and below its manufacturer average by 1,3 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Matte Lillac Purple PLA Matte Purple is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 44% overall, is below the material-family average by 4,4 points, and is roughly aligned with the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 44%
133 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 86/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 28/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Stiffness: 68/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 25/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall46/100133 / 234Better than 44%
Tensile22/100164 / 226Better than 28%
Impact28/10073 / 226Better than 68%
Stiffness68/100157 / 223Better than 30%
Consistency86/10019 / 231Better than 92%
Layer adhesion25/100105 / 226Better than 54%
Thermal25/100195 / 209Better than 7%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0069ProtoPasta HTPLA Blood of My Enemies PLA RedProtoPasta100/100
MAT0079Polymaker PolyLight PLA Pro BlackPolymaker65/10035/10052/100
MAT0109Polymaker PolyMax PLA BlackPolymaker64/10032/10062/100
MAT0080Polymaker PolySonic PLA Pro BluePolymaker64/10030/10058/100
MAT0076BambuLab Tough+ PLA Tough+ BlackBambuLab63/10026/10059/100
MAT0108Polymaker PolyLight PLA BlackPolymaker61/10033/10014/100
MAT0074Winkle Matte PLA Matte RedWinkle60/10034/100
MAT0122Add:North Enhanced PLA ClearAdd:North59/10040/10010/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.