Public engineering report

BambuLab Matte Latte Brown PLA Matte Brown

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0071
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$43.92 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0071
MaterialBambuLab Matte Latte Brown PLA Matte Brown
ManufacturerBambuLab
Product lineMatte
Base materialPLA
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishMatte
Reinforcement—
ColorBrown

Governed engineering profile

Overall39/100
Tensile22/100
Impact—
Izod8/100
Charpy12/100
Stiffness66/100
Consistency80/100
Layer adhesion17/100
Thermal25/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
39/100
Tensile
22/100
Impact
—
Izod
8/100
Charpy
12/100
Stiffness
66/100
Consistency
80/100
Layer adhesion
17/100
Thermal
25/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PLA
Manufacturer average - BambuLab

Legacy Impact radar: 23.197 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

50 °C · score 25/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall39/100——
Tensile22/10030/10026/100
Impact———
Izod8/10010/1008/100
Charpy12/10011/10010/100
Stiffness66/10087/10077/100
Consistency80/10077/10077/100
Layer adhesion17/10031/10024/100
Thermal25/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.041 MPa1.627 MPa32.3%99/10
Tensile flat30.316 MPa2.797 MPa9.2%1010/10
Impact upright7.482 kJ/m²0.935 kJ/m²12.5%1010/10
Impact flat18.951 kJ/m²1.749 kJ/m²9.2%1010/10
Izod6.224 kJ/m²0.354 kJ/m²5.7%1010/10
Charpy9.24 kJ/m²2.95 kJ/m²31.9%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1984.002 MPa————
Stiffness deflection2.735 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-13
Charpy2026-10-13
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: BambuLab Matte Latte Brown PLA Matte Brown has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Izod.
Data-driven review: BambuLab Matte Latte Brown PLA Matte Brown is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 19% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Izod
Dataset position
Better than 19%
136 / 166

Strengths

  • Consistency: 80/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 22/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 10/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Stiffness: 66/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
  • Layer adhesion: 17/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall39/100136 / 166Better than 19%
Tensile22/100176 / 243Better than 28%
Impact———
Izod8/10070 / 171Better than 60%
Charpy12/10052 / 170Better than 70%
Stiffness66/100175 / 240Better than 28%
Consistency80/100107 / 244Better than 57%
Layer adhesion17/100167 / 243Better than 32%
Thermal25/100204 / 226Better than 10%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0265Coex 3D Standard Scarlet Red PLA RedCoex 3D58/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0066ProtoPasta HTPLA Cloverleaf Metallic Green PLA Metal GreenProtoPasta56/10029/100—n/an/a
MAT0118Prusa3D Prusament Azure Blue PLA BluePrusa3D55/10036/100—n/an/a
MAT0106Add:North Econymy PLA BlackAdd:North55/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0112Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black PLA BlackPrusa3D52/10038/100—n/an/a
MAT0161Winkle Standard Confeti PLA HD Texture BrownWinkle52/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0143Prusa3D Prusament Corn Pigment PLA Recycled BrownPrusa3D52/10030/100—n/an/a
MAT0203Prusa3D Prusament Prusa Orange PLA OrangePrusa3D52/10042/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-13
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 9.24 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 2.95 kJ/m²; CV 31.929%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-13
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 6.224 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.354 kJ/m²; CV 5.688%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.