Public engineering report

3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0040
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$59.95 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0040
Material3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red
Manufacturer3D Fuel
Product linePCTG
Base materialPCTG
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishPro
ReinforcementGF
ColorRed

Governed engineering profile

Overall42/100
Tensile25/100
Impact31/100
Stiffness62/100
Consistency78/100
Layer adhesion15/100
Thermal34/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
42/100
Tensile
25/100
Impact
31/100
Stiffness
62/100
Consistency
78/100
Layer adhesion
15/100
Thermal
34/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PCTG
Manufacturer average - 3D Fuel

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

67 °C · score 34/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall42/10043/10045/100
Tensile25/10028/10029/100
Impact31/10022/10025/100
Stiffness62/10061/10067/100
Consistency78/10077/10079/100
Layer adhesion15/10026/10025/100
Thermal34/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright5.287 MPa2.29 MPa43.3%88/10
Tensile flat35.407 MPa3.999 MPa11.3%1010/10
Impact upright102.492 kJ/m²17.821 kJ/m²17.4%1010/10
Impact flat508.692 kJ/m²66.143 kJ/m²13%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1845.122 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.941 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: 3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 0,7 points and below its manufacturer average by 2,7 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: 3D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 23% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is roughly aligned with the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 23%
182 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 78/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 31/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 25/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 31/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Layer adhesion: 15/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall42/100182 / 234Better than 23%
Tensile25/100147 / 226Better than 35%
Impact31/10062 / 226Better than 73%
Stiffness62/100181 / 223Better than 19%
Consistency78/100114 / 231Better than 51%
Layer adhesion15/100170 / 226Better than 25%
Thermal34/10069 / 209Better than 67%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT00393D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black3D Fuel48/10027/10026/100

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT00393D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black3D Fuel48/10027/10026/100
MAT00413D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue3D Fuel44/10034/10017/100
MAT0227Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG BlueSpectrum43/10034/10023/100
MAT0238Yasin Standard Green PCTG GreenYasin37/10022/10012/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.