Public engineering report

3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0039
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$54.95 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0039
Material3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black
Manufacturer3D Fuel
Product linePCTG
Base materialPCTG
CategoryStandard
Variant / finishPro
ReinforcementCF
ColorBlack

Governed engineering profile

Overall48/100
Tensile27/100
Impact26/100
Stiffness88/100
Consistency81/100
Layer adhesion17/100
Thermal33/100
Best available axisstiffness

Engineering score profile

Overall
48/100
Tensile
27/100
Impact
26/100
Stiffness
88/100
Consistency
81/100
Layer adhesion
17/100
Thermal
33/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PCTG
Manufacturer average - 3D Fuel

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

65 °C · score 33/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall48/10043/10045/100
Tensile27/10028/10029/100
Impact26/10022/10025/100
Stiffness88/10061/10067/100
Consistency81/10077/10079/100
Layer adhesion17/10026/10025/100
Thermal33/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright6.494 MPa2.888 MPa44.5%99/10
Tensile flat37.437 MPa6.628 MPa17.7%1010/10
Impact upright100.775 kJ/m²8.004 kJ/m²7.9%1010/10
Impact flat413.906 kJ/m²19.624 kJ/m²4.7%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2635.889 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.059 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: 3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 5,1 points and above its manufacturer average by 3,1 points. Its strongest measured axis is Stiffness, while the weakest axis is Layer Adhesion.
Data-driven review: 3D Fuel PCTG PCTG Pro CF Black is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 56% overall, is above the material-family average by 5,1 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 3,1 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Stiffness, while Layer Adhesion is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Stiffness
Main limitation
Layer Adhesion
Dataset position
Better than 56%
105 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 81/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Stiffness: 88/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 27/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Impact: 26/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
  • Layer adhesion: 17/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall48/100105 / 234Better than 56%
Tensile27/100122 / 226Better than 46%
Impact26/10085 / 226Better than 63%
Stiffness88/10083 / 223Better than 63%
Consistency81/10068 / 231Better than 71%
Layer adhesion17/100151 / 226Better than 34%
Thermal33/10073 / 209Better than 66%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT00413D Fuel PCTG Cobalt Blue PCTG Pro Blue3D Fuel44/10034/10017/100
MAT0227Spectrum Smart Sky Blue PCTG BlueSpectrum43/10034/10023/100
MAT00403D Fuel PCTG Toolbox Red PCTG Pro GF Red3D Fuel42/10025/10031/100
MAT0238Yasin Standard Green PCTG GreenYasin37/10022/10012/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.