Public engineering report
Yasin Standard Clear PMMA Clear
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$36.80 USD/kg
Material identity
| MaterialID | MAT0035 |
|---|---|
| Material | Yasin Standard Clear PMMA Clear |
| Manufacturer | Yasin |
| Product line | Standard |
| Base material | PMMA |
| Category | Engineering |
| Variant / finish | — |
| Reinforcement | — |
| Color | Clear |
Governed engineering profile
| Overall | 39/100 |
|---|---|
| Tensile | 20/100 |
| Impact | 31/100 |
| Stiffness | 30/100 |
| Consistency | 67/100 |
| Layer adhesion | 46/100 |
| Thermal | 38/100 |
| Best available axis | consistency |
Engineering score profile
Engineering radar
Selected material
Material average - PMMA
Manufacturer average - Yasin
All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.
Fixture thermal result
76 °C · score 38/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.
Material and manufacturer context
| Metric | Selected material | Material average | Manufacturer average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 39/100 | 39/100 | 43/100 |
| Tensile | 20/100 | 20/100 | 24/100 |
| Impact | 31/100 | 31/100 | 25/100 |
| Stiffness | 30/100 | 30/100 | 75/100 |
| Consistency | 67/100 | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Layer adhesion | 46/100 | 46/100 | 19/100 |
| Thermal | 38/100 | — | — |
Verified measurement results
Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.
| Measurement | Average | Std. deviation | CV | Samples | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile upright | 9.998 MPa | 3.148 MPa | 31.5% | 8 | 8/10 |
| Tensile flat | 21.718 MPa | 5.207 MPa | 24% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Impact upright | 74.612 kJ/m² | 31.938 kJ/m² | 42.8% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Impact flat | 545.901 kJ/m² | 168.401 kJ/m² | 30.8% | 10 | 10/10 |
| Stiffness modulus | 887.078 MPa | — | — | — | — |
| Stiffness deflection | 6.117 mm | — | — | — | — |
Measurement provenance
Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.
| Module | Measured date |
|---|---|
| Tensile | Not recorded |
| Impact | Not recorded |
| Stiffness | Not recorded |
| Thermal | Not recorded |
Engineering interpretation
Summary: Yasin Standard Clear PMMA Clear has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 0 points and below its manufacturer average by 4,3 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Yasin Standard Clear PMMA Clear is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 10% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is below the manufacturer average by 4,3 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 10%
211 / 234
Strengths
- Best available signal: Consistency at 67/100.
Limitations
- Tensile: 20/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
- Impact: 31/100. Avoid high impact or shock-loaded components without additional validation.
- Stiffness: 30/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
Engineering trade-offs
- Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
- The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.
Recommended applications
- Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
- Avoid high tensile load applications
- Avoid high impact components
Metric rankings and percentiles
| Metric | Score | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 39/100 | 211 / 234 | Better than 10% |
| Tensile | 20/100 | 187 / 226 | Better than 18% |
| Impact | 31/100 | 60 / 226 | Better than 74% |
| Stiffness | 30/100 | 222 / 223 | Better than 1% |
| Consistency | 67/100 | 213 / 231 | Better than 8% |
| Layer adhesion | 46/100 | 29 / 226 | Better than 88% |
| Thermal | 38/100 | 58 / 209 | Better than 73% |
Decision guidance
- Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
- Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.
- Avoid selecting it for impact-focused testing or shock-loaded designs.
Better alternatives
| MaterialID | Material | Manufacturer | Overall | Tensile | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset. | |||||
Peer context
Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.
| MaterialID | Material | Manufacturer | Overall | Tensile | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No same-material peers with governed score context are available. | |||||
Public links
Methodology and limitations
Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.