Public engineering report

Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0031
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$45.64 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0031
MaterialExtrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green
ManufacturerExtrudr
Product lineDuraPro
Base materialPC/PBT
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall61/100
Tensile33/100
Impact70/100
Stiffness66/100
Consistency92/100
Layer adhesion43/100
Thermal50/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
61/100
Tensile
33/100
Impact
70/100
Stiffness
66/100
Consistency
92/100
Layer adhesion
43/100
Thermal
50/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PC/PBT
Manufacturer average - Extrudr

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

99 °C · score 50/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall61/10055/10047/100
Tensile33/10028/10025/100
Impact70/10054/10038/100
Stiffness66/10075/10070/100
Consistency92/10085/10078/100
Layer adhesion43/10031/10025/100
Thermal50/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright15.765 MPa2.344 MPa14.9%1010/10
Tensile flat36.56 MPa1.562 MPa4.3%1010/10
Impact upright215.375 kJ/m²25.669 kJ/m²11.9%1010/10
Impact flat1175.216 kJ/m²5.976 kJ/m²0.5%1010/10
Stiffness modulus1984.002 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.735 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green has a balanced mid-range engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 6,2 points and above its manufacturer average by 13,5 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green PC/PBT Green is best understood as a balanced material for general functional prototypes. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 97% overall, is above the material-family average by 6,2 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 13,5 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 97%
8 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 43/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 92/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 70/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Tensile: 33/100. Tensile behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 33/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Impact-aware parts where toughness matters
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall61/1008 / 234Better than 97%
Tensile33/10072 / 226Better than 69%
Impact70/1002 / 226Better than 100%
Stiffness66/100164 / 223Better than 27%
Consistency92/1001 / 231Better than 100%
Layer adhesion43/10039 / 226Better than 83%
Thermal50/10016 / 209Better than 93%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0030Extrudr DuraPro PC/PBT CF BlackExtrudr48/10023/10039/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.