Public engineering report

Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0022
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Rigid test coverage
Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1
Engineering axes
7/8
Public MSRP
$46.74 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0022
MaterialFillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear
ManufacturerFillamentum
Product lineFX256
Base materialPA12
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish—
Reinforcement—
ColorClear

Governed engineering profile

Overall41/100
Tensile28/100
Impact—
Izod10/100
Charpy12/100
Stiffness26/100
Consistency85/100
Layer adhesion54/100
Thermal33/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
41/100
Tensile
28/100
Impact
—
Izod
10/100
Charpy
12/100
Stiffness
26/100
Consistency
85/100
Layer adhesion
54/100
Thermal
33/100

Engineering radar

TensileLegacy Impact %IzodCharpyStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - PA12
Manufacturer average - Fillamentum

Legacy Impact radar: 39.731 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

65 °C · score 33/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall41/10041/100—
Tensile28/10032/10032/100
Impact———
Izod10/10014/10010/100
Charpy12/10014/10012/100
Stiffness26/10054/10026/100
Consistency85/10082/10085/100
Layer adhesion54/10021/10051/100
Thermal33/100——

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright15.704 MPa4.843 MPa30.8%1010/10
Tensile flat28.901 MPa2.545 MPa8.8%1010/10
Impact upright8.019 kJ/m²4.526 kJ/m²56.4%1010/10
Impact flat37.254 kJ/m²11.089 kJ/m²29.8%88/10
Izod7.858 kJ/m²0.698 kJ/m²8.9%1010/10
Charpy9.334 kJ/m²1.074 kJ/m²11.5%1010/10
Stiffness modulus768.801 MPa————
Stiffness deflection7.058 mm————

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
Izod2026-10-07
Charpy2026-10-07
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is below its material-family average by 0,1 points and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Izod.
Data-driven review: Fillamentum FX256 PA12 Clear is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 32% overall, is roughly aligned with the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Izod is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Izod
Dataset position
Better than 32%
114 / 166

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 54/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 85/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 28/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Izod/Charpy impact family: 11/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
  • Stiffness: 26/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Layer bonding may be acceptable, but stiffness is still a limiting design factor.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications
  • Avoid high impact components

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall41/100114 / 166Better than 32%
Tensile28/100132 / 243Better than 46%
Impact———
Izod10/10055 / 171Better than 68%
Charpy12/10051 / 170Better than 71%
Stiffness26/100240 / 240Better than 0%
Consistency85/10044 / 244Better than 82%
Layer adhesion54/10015 / 243Better than 94%
Thermal33/10080 / 226Better than 65%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0214Eryone Standard Black PA12 CF BlackEryone48/10043/100—
MAT0167BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF BlackBambuLab48/10039/100—
MAT0020Extrudr DuraPro PA12 BlackExtrudr44/10034/100—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpactIzodCharpy
MAT0214Eryone Standard Black PA12 CF BlackEryone48/10043/100—n/an/a
MAT0167BambuLab Basic PA12 PAHT CF BlackBambuLab48/10039/100—n/an/a
MAT0020Extrudr DuraPro PA12 BlackExtrudr44/10034/100—n/an/a
MAT0019MatterHackers NylonX PA12 CF BlackMatterHackers43/10032/100—n/an/a
MAT0209Eryone Standard Black PA12 GF BlackEryone41/10033/100—n/an/a
MAT0239Yasin Standard Black PA12 CF BlackYasin39/10033/100—n/an/a
MAT0196Extrudr DuraPro Black PA12 CF BlackExtrudr34/10028/100—n/an/a
MAT0021Yasin Standard Black PA12 BlackYasin31/10022/100—n/an/a

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-07
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 9.334 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 1.074 kJ/m²; CV 11.507%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-07
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 7.858 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 0.698 kJ/m²; CV 8.878%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.