Public engineering report

Yasin Standard White ASA White

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0017

3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
Generated 2026-10-13 19:28:11

Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.

Rigid test coverage

Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1

Engineering axes

7/8

Public MSRP

$27.52 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialID	MAT0017
Material	Yasin Standard White ASA White
Manufacturer	Yasin
Product line	Standard
Base material	ASA
Category	Engineering
Variant / finish	—
Reinforcement	—
Color	White

Governed engineering profile

Overall	40/100
Tensile	21/100
Impact	—
Izod	38/100
Charpy	42/100
Stiffness	52/100
Consistency	66/100
Layer adhesion	22/100
Thermal	43/100
Best available axis	consistency

Engineering score profile

Overall

40/100

Tensile

21/100

Impact

—

Izod

38/100

Charpy

42/100

Stiffness

52/100

Consistency

66/100

Layer adhesion

22/100

Thermal

43/100

Engineering radar

Selected material

Material average - ASA

Manufacturer average - Yasin

Legacy Impact radar: 43.475 % of legacy rig capacity. This historical visual reference is the mean corrected Flat/Upright result divided by the matching rig capacity; it is not a modern engineering score.

Izod and Charpy use versioned method references and together form one equally weighted impact family. Overall requires all five families and both calibrated methods; incomplete profiles are not ranked. Legacy Impact and thermal are outside Overall. Missing axes have gaps with no marker or filled polygon; measured zero retains a centre marker.

Fixture thermal result

86 °C · score 43/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

Metric	Selected material	Material average	Manufacturer average
Overall	40/100	—	—
Tensile	21/100	19/100	25/100
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	38/100	24/100	16/100
Charpy	42/100	32/100	15/100
Stiffness	52/100	68/100	75/100
Consistency	66/100	70/100	72/100
Layer adhesion	22/100	20/100	19/100
Thermal	43/100	—	—

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

Measurement	Average	Std. deviation	CV	Samples	Confidence
Tensile upright	6.075 MPa	1.998 MPa	32.9%	10	10/10
Tensile flat	27.716 MPa	3.41 MPa	12.3%	10	10/10
Impact upright	6.659 kJ/m²	1.198 kJ/m²	18%	10	10/10
Impact flat	42.879 kJ/m²	1.056 kJ/m²	2.5%	10	10/10
Izod	30.509 kJ/m²	10.463 kJ/m²	34.3%	10	10/10
Charpy	33.355 kJ/m²	17.697 kJ/m²	53.1%	8	8/10
Stiffness modulus	1563.663 MPa	—	—	—	—
Stiffness deflection	3.47 mm	—	—	—	—

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

Module	Measured date
Tensile	Not recorded
Impact	Not recorded
Izod	2026-10-06
Charpy	2026-10-06
Stiffness	Not recorded
Thermal	Not recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Yasin Standard White ASA White has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is without enough material-family average context and without enough manufacturer average context. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.

Data-driven review: Yasin Standard White ASA White is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 27% overall, is missing enough context for the material-family average, and is missing enough context for the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.

Best feature

Consistency

Main limitation

Tensile

Dataset position

Better than 27%

123 / 166

Strengths

Izod/Charpy impact family: 40/100. The two-method impact score is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

Tensile: 21/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
Izod/Charpy impact family: 40/100. Validate impact or shock-loaded components against their application requirements.
Stiffness: 52/100. Expect less shape stability than the stronger materials in the same family.
Layer adhesion: 22/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

Metric	Score	Rank	Percentile
Overall	40/100	123 / 166	Better than 27%
Tensile	21/100	191 / 243	Better than 22%
Impact	—	—	—
Izod	38/100	8 / 171	Better than 96%
Charpy	42/100	11 / 170	Better than 94%
Stiffness	52/100	214 / 240	Better than 11%
Consistency	66/100	214 / 244	Better than 13%
Layer adhesion	22/100	137 / 243	Better than 44%
Thermal	43/100	38 / 226	Better than 84%

Decision guidance

Use this material mainly for low-load, visual or experimental parts.
Review the listed alternatives if the application needs stronger overall performance.
Do not choose it as a tensile-strength benchmark material.

Better alternatives

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy
MAT0015	Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green	Prusa3D	48/100	23/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0197	Siraya Tech Fiberheart Black ASA GF Black	Siraya Tech	43/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0010	Yasin Standard Black ASA GF Black	Yasin	42/100	21/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0012	Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA Black	Prusa3D	41/100	18/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0218	Eryone Standard White ASA GF White	Eryone	40/100	17/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0011	Extrudr DuraPro Neon Green ASA GF Green	Extrudr	40/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0009	Yasin Standard Black ASA CF Black	Yasin	40/100	20/100	—	n/a	n/a
MAT0008	Extrudr DuraPro ASA CF Black	Extrudr	39/100	15/100	—	n/a	n/a

Public links

Manufacturer website Download PDF

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 30.509 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 10.463 kJ/m²; CV 34.294%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 33.355 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 17.697 kJ/m²; CV 53.056%; Samples 8; Confidence 8
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.