Public engineering report

Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0015
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$26.40 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0015
MaterialPrusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green
ManufacturerPrusa3D
Product linePrusament
Base materialASA
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finishPro
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall48/100
Tensile23/100
Impact44/100
Stiffness71/100
Consistency81/100
Layer adhesion24/100
Thermal45/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
48/100
Tensile
23/100
Impact
44/100
Stiffness
71/100
Consistency
81/100
Layer adhesion
24/100
Thermal
45/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - ASA
Manufacturer average - Prusa3D

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

90 °C · score 45/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall48/10044/10049/100
Tensile23/10019/10031/100
Impact44/10037/10021/100
Stiffness71/10068/10084/100
Consistency81/10076/10079/100
Layer adhesion24/10020/10032/100
Thermal45/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright7.029 MPa2.818 MPa40.1%1010/10
Tensile flat29.87 MPa4.561 MPa15.3%1010/10
Impact upright71.149 kJ/m²10.71 kJ/m²15.1%1010/10
Impact flat799.732 kJ/m²50.06 kJ/m²6.3%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2133.089 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.544 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 4,2 points and below its manufacturer average by 1 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 58% overall, is above the material-family average by 4,2 points, and is roughly aligned with the manufacturer average. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 58%
99 / 234

Strengths

  • Consistency: 81/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 44/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.
  • Stiffness: 71/100. Stiffness is a relative advantage in this comparison group.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 23/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 24/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.
  • Stiffness is useful for shape stability, but impact tolerance is a separate limitation.
  • The report should be read as a suitability warning rather than a general-purpose recommendation.

Recommended applications

  • Rigid brackets, fixtures and shape-stable prototypes
  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall48/10099 / 234Better than 58%
Tensile23/100158 / 226Better than 31%
Impact44/10042 / 226Better than 82%
Stiffness71/100140 / 223Better than 38%
Consistency81/10069 / 231Better than 71%
Layer adhesion24/100113 / 226Better than 50%
Thermal45/10024 / 209Better than 89%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0014Extrudr DuraPro Emerald Green ASA GreenExtrudr51/10021/10049/100
MAT0211Eryone Standard Black ASA High Speed BlackEryone48/10019/10050/100
MAT0016Extrudr DuraPro ASA RedExtrudr48/10019/10050/100
MAT0148Thorwell Standard ASA ASA YellowThorwell46/10022/10056/100
MAT0216Eryone Standard White ASA WhiteEryone46/10023/10051/100
MAT0017Yasin Standard White ASA WhiteYasin46/10021/10051/100
MAT0179BambuLab Standard Blue ASA BlueBambuLab45/10022/10045/100
MAT0012Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA BlackPrusa3D45/10018/10042/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.