Public engineering report

Extrudr DuraPro Emerald Green ASA Green

Material Engineering Report
MaterialID MAT0014
3DPIceland Engineering Platform
3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v60.0.6 WORKFLOW-RELIABILITY - Bug Fixes and Workflow Reliability
Generated 2026-08-25 19:02:26
Public-data contract: This static report contains only allowlisted material identity, public links, canonical MSRP and existing Verified Material Summary / governed score outputs. It excludes raw specimen rows and non-public operational data.
Test coverage
Complete
Engineering axes
6/6
Public MSRP
$21.97 USD/kg

Material identity

MaterialIDMAT0014
MaterialExtrudr DuraPro Emerald Green ASA Green
ManufacturerExtrudr
Product lineDuraPro
Base materialASA
CategoryEngineering
Variant / finish
Reinforcement
ColorGreen

Governed engineering profile

Overall51/100
Tensile21/100
Impact49/100
Stiffness67/100
Consistency84/100
Layer adhesion35/100
Thermal42/100
Best available axisconsistency

Engineering score profile

Overall
51/100
Tensile
21/100
Impact
49/100
Stiffness
67/100
Consistency
84/100
Layer adhesion
35/100
Thermal
42/100

Engineering radar

TensileImpactStiffnessThermalLayer adhesionConsistency
Selected material
Material average - ASA
Manufacturer average - Extrudr

All axes use existing governed 0–100 engineering scores. Missing axes are shown at zero and remain listed as n/a elsewhere in the report.

Fixture thermal result

83 °C · score 42/100 · method 3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1
Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.

Material and manufacturer context

MetricSelected materialMaterial averageManufacturer average
Overall51/10044/10047/100
Tensile21/10019/10025/100
Impact49/10037/10038/100
Stiffness67/10068/10070/100
Consistency84/10076/10078/100
Layer adhesion35/10020/10025/100
Thermal42/100

Verified measurement results

Existing Verified Material Summary outputs. The public renderer does not read raw specimen rows or recalculate these values.

MeasurementAverageStd. deviationCVSamplesConfidence
Tensile upright8.818 MPa1.792 MPa20.3%99/10
Tensile flat25.178 MPa1.594 MPa6.3%1010/10
Impact upright85.561 kJ/m²24.545 kJ/m²28.7%1010/10
Impact flat898.254 kJ/m²70.287 kJ/m²7.8%1010/10
Stiffness modulus2005.568 MPa
Stiffness deflection2.706 mm

Measurement provenance

Canonical per-module measured dates from SQLite, shown in unambiguous ISO format. Missing dates are not inferred.

ModuleMeasured date
TensileNot recorded
ImpactNot recorded
StiffnessNot recorded
ThermalNot recorded

Engineering interpretation

Summary: Extrudr DuraPro Emerald Green ASA Green has a specialized or limited engineering profile. It is above its material-family average by 7 points and above its manufacturer average by 4 points. Its strongest measured axis is Consistency, while the weakest axis is Tensile.
Data-driven review: Extrudr DuraPro Emerald Green ASA Green is best understood as a repeatable material for cosmetic, concept and low-load prototype work. Compared with the current verified dataset, it ranks better than 70% overall, is above the material-family average by 7 points, and is above the manufacturer average by 4 points. Its strongest engineering signal is Consistency, while Tensile is the main limitation to consider before using it for demanding applications.
Best feature
Consistency
Main limitation
Tensile
Dataset position
Better than 70%
72 / 234

Strengths

  • Layer adhesion: 35/100. Z-axis bonding is better than the material-family context.
  • Consistency: 84/100. Repeatability is one of the stronger signals in this material profile.
  • Impact: 49/100. Impact behavior is competitive against the material-family context.

Limitations

  • Tensile: 21/100. Avoid using this as the primary choice for tensile-loaded parts.
  • Layer adhesion: 35/100. Z-axis performance should be treated with caution.

Engineering trade-offs

  • Good repeatability does not compensate for low tensile capability in load-bearing designs.

Recommended applications

  • Repeatable print jobs and production-style batches
  • Cosmetic parts, concept models or low-load prototypes
  • Avoid high tensile load applications

Metric rankings and percentiles

MetricScoreRankPercentile
Overall51/10072 / 234Better than 70%
Tensile21/100175 / 226Better than 23%
Impact49/10029 / 226Better than 88%
Stiffness67/100162 / 223Better than 28%
Consistency84/10035 / 231Better than 85%
Layer adhesion35/10063 / 226Better than 73%
Thermal42/10041 / 209Better than 81%

Decision guidance

Better alternatives

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
No stronger same-base-material alternatives were identified in the current governed dataset.

Peer context

Highest-scoring same-base-material peers from the current governed dataset. This context is descriptive and is not recalculated by the public renderer.

MaterialIDMaterialManufacturerOverallTensileImpact
MAT0015Prusa3D Prusament ASA Pro GreenPrusa3D48/10023/10044/100
MAT0211Eryone Standard Black ASA High Speed BlackEryone48/10019/10050/100
MAT0016Extrudr DuraPro ASA RedExtrudr48/10019/10050/100
MAT0148Thorwell Standard ASA ASA YellowThorwell46/10022/10056/100
MAT0216Eryone Standard White ASA WhiteEryone46/10023/10051/100
MAT0017Yasin Standard White ASA WhiteYasin46/10021/10051/100
MAT0179BambuLab Standard Blue ASA BlueBambuLab45/10022/10045/100
MAT0012Prusa3D Prusament Galaxy Black ASA BlackPrusa3D45/10018/10042/100

Public links

Methodology and limitations

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements from home-built test equipment. Thermal is a nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature, not ASTM D648, ISO 75 or specimen temperature. Missing evidence remains n/a. Scores and test results are not recalculated by this publishing layer and do not replace certified manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.