Public comparison report

HIPS Material Family Comparison

3DPIceland Labs
Generated with 3DPIceland Engineering Platform v70.0.4 DIRECT-IMPACT-METHODOLOGY - Izod and Charpy Methodology
2026-10-13 19:30:45

Public-data contract: only explicitly allowlisted MaterialIDs and existing Verified Material Summary scores are included. No measurements or scores are recalculated.

Comparison scope: Stable Material Family preset for HIPS. Every included MaterialID has explicit Public reports opt-in.

Materials compared

2

Overall score available

1

All 8 axes available

0

Engineering-axis leaders in this comparison

Axis	Leading material	Score
Overall	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	42
Tensile	Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue	14
Impact	—	n/a
Izod	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	48
Charpy	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	49
Stiffness	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	66
Consistency	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	72
Layer adhesion	Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue	11
Thermal	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	40

Overall comparison

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

42/100

Tensile comparison

Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue

14/100

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

12/100

Izod comparison

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

48/100

Charpy comparison

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

49/100

Stiffness comparison

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

66/100

Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue

63/100

Thermal comparison

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

40/100

Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue

38/100

Materials and evidence context

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Product line	Type	Reinforcement	Rigid test coverage	Engineering axes
MAT0240	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	Yasin	Standard	HIPS		Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1	7/8
MAT0146	Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue	Thorwell	Standard	HIPS		Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1	5/8

Side-by-side engineering scores

MaterialID	Material	Manufacturer	Reinforcement	Rigid coverage	Evidence	Overall	Tensile	Impact	Izod	Charpy	Stiffness	Consistency	Layer adhesion	Thermal	Fixture °C	Method	Thermal limitation	MSRP USD/kg
MAT0240	Yasin Standard White HIPS White	Yasin		Complete; 5/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 2/2 measured, 2/2 scored; Overall eligible; policy engineering-score-v70-1	7/8	42/100	12/100	—	48/100	49/100	66/100	72/100	11/100	40/100	80 °C	3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1	Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.	$26.88
MAT0146	Thorwell Standard HIPS HIPS Blue	Thorwell		Partial; 4/5 score families; Izod/Charpy 0/2 measured, 0/2 scored; Overall unavailable: missing measurements or references; policy engineering-score-v70-1	5/8	—	14/100	—	—	—	63/100	67/100	11/100	38/100	76 °C	3dp-thermal-deflection-fixture-v1	Nearby BlueDOT probe-indicated fixture temperature from a non-standard comparative 3DPIceland method; not ASTM D648, ISO 75, specimen temperature, certified HDT or a manufacturer limit.	$32.00

Results are comparative 3DPIceland measurements and do not replace manufacturer datasheets or accredited laboratory testing.

Testing methodology · Engineering methodology whitepaper · Download PDF

Yasin Standard White HIPS White

Izod and Charpy Impact Strength

Izod Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 38.196 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 3.111 kJ/m²; CV 8.145%; Samples 10; Confidence 10
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Charpy Impact Strength · 2026-10-06
Instrument readings in kJ/m²
Mean 39.401 kJ/m²; Std. Dev 5.476 kJ/m²; CV 13.898%; Samples 7; Confidence 7
No break 0; invalid 0; excluded 0.
Comparative measurements; standard conformity unverified.

Score policy engineering-score-v70-1: Overall requires tensile, stiffness, consistency, layer adhesion and the Izod/Charpy impact family, each with equal weight. Both impact methods and configured versioned references are required. Missing results and unconfigured scores remain n/a. Legacy Impact is historical only; thermal remains separate. Engineering-axis counts describe displayed evidence, not Overall completeness.